accountable (əˈkaʊntəb ə l)
|1.||responsible to someone or for some action; answerable|
|2.||able to be explained|
"We must embrace a culture of innovation and accountability by adopting proven reforms"
Governor Bob McDonnell is a strong supporter of teacher and school accountability. Apparently not so much for leadership accountability.
The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools is one of six regional accrediting organizations recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. K-12 public schools and colleges in eleven states receive accreditation from SACS. They are a recognized and legitimate source of accountability for institutions.
This organization issued an official Warning to the University of Virginia for non-compliance with it's standards. A warning that if not addressed could lead to loss of accreditation. This warning had nothing to do with academic quality at the University. The warning applies solely with leadership of the institution, specifically, minority control of the board and decision-making. This warning is a direct result of the Board of Visitors actions last summer in dismissing President Teresa Sullivan.
How did the Governor hold the Rector of the UVA Board of Visitors accountable for leading the board down this improper path?
He reappointed her to the position.
How is the Virginia Legislature holding her accountable for her actions?
They're moving forward with approving her nomination to the Board.
Don't pretend to care about accountability if you're only interested in accountability for some.
Maybe if teachers contributed more to political campaigns we'd get better treatment?
From the University of Virginia Website:
In response to the resignation and subsequent reinstatement of President Teresa A. Sullivan, SACSCOC required that the University document compliance with three principles – Principle 1.1 (Integrity), Core Requirement 2.2 (Governing Board), and Comprehensive Standard 3.7.5 (Faculty Role in Governance). After reviewing the response from the University’s Board of Visitors, the Board of Trustees of SACSCOC found the University non-compliant with Core Requirement 2.2 and Comprehensive Standard 3.7.5. In a recent press conference after the announcement, the president of SACSCOC cited concerns related to minority control of the board (Core Requirement 2.2) and policies surrounding faculty role in governance (Comprehensive Standard 3.7.5).