At least some of the nation is familiar by now with the case of Natalie Munroe. Munroe stands to lose her job as a teacher because of the comments made on her blog. The blog has been removed, but the last page cached by Google can still be viewed. I've read reports of the comments in other news stories and while the comments reflect poor judgement and attitude in general, it does not appear that any of them were directed at a student in general. Should she lose her job for engaging in this type of free speech?

So how much freedom do teachers have to express themselves and their personal opinons online? Perhaps a good standard would be that if it is acceptable in public it should be acceptable online. I cannot pass judgement on this particular case without really seeing not only the comments, but the context of Munroe's musings, but this information is not currently available. Many teachers have chosen to go the route of sarcasm and parody to anonymously bemoan and complain about difficulties of teaching. (A prime example being Mr. Teachbad -- be warned, this content is not always G-rated quality) Even if we draw the line at student directed criticism, how far can a teacher go in criticising the institutions which employ them?
Taboo
The second issue raised by the "Natalie Munroe Blog Scandal" is that of student motivation and accountability. Increasingly, this has become the taboo topic for discussion in the public policy forums of education. I have been lucky to teach mostly seniors in elective Psychology classes for the last six or seven years. With a few exceptions, they are capable and eager to learn. But I can vividly remember some of the classes that were not. My third year of teaching I had already decided that a career change was in order if things did not improve the next. They did, but as much a result of my students as my effort.
In responding to the Munroe story, one commenter urged her to get out of the profession anyway because part of the job of a teacher is to motivate these students to learn. If more people outside of the classroom understood how much of a struggle this can be, the impression of teachers in America would greatly change. Increasingly, accountability drops in the lap of teachers at the exclusion of all else. One argument takes the analogy of production. If a company builds a defective product, the product isn't blamed for coming out flawed. I've yet to meet a "product" that plays a role in its own development, possessing the autonomy and ability to respond to or rebel against the process which creates it.
I never want to be the teacher, and I would never support a teacher who attempts to make students shoulder the entire responsibility of their own education, but questioning the ability, motivation, or effort of students has become the taboo topic of education. If nothing else, I hope this event opens the door to looking holistically at how we promote student achievement. Accountability for administrators in providing solid leadership, accountability for teachers in providing quality instruction, and accountability from students in taking ownership of their learning and achievement.
My thoughts on all of this could change over time, but I believe it really opens the doors for discussion that could benefit our profession and the individuals in it. What are the limits to teachers' free speech online? and Is it time that we break the taboo of questioning student responsibility and accountability for their own education?
Image: http://www.digitaltrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/internet-social-networking-computer-monitor-privacy-monitoring-300x200.jpg